There’s no getting around it. Room‘s distinctive two-act structure and the indisputable fact that its second half is every bit as significant as the first leave me no choice but to warn that there will be spoilers. That’s the only way to do this remarkable film justice. To proceed otherwise would be as pointless as reviewing Jaws and not mentioning a boat trip.
Based on Emma Donoghue’s 2010 novel and brilliantly adapted by the author, the movie starts as the story of a mother and 5-year-old son struggling to cope with the nightmare of captivity. Ma is 24 and has been a sexual slave for seven years. She’s played with astonishing depth and fearlessness by Brie Larson, whose performance earned a Best Actress Oscar nomination.
Jacob Tremblay, who was 8 when the movie was made, is a small wonder, with instincts that make his Jack one of the year’s most unforgettable screen creations. In the film’s first half, we watch as mother and child go through the paces of typical days that are anything but. Ma reads to Jack, exercises with him, encourages him to draw and write stories, and makes him comfortable with the notion that the 10-by-10-foot shed in which they’re trapped is the entire world. Having never stepped outside, he has no reason to suspect otherwise.
“Hello, lamp. Hello, sink. Hello, stove,” Jack cheerfully begins each day, greeting the objects that are locked in with him as best friends. His mother single-mindedly shields him from the truth by nurturing an illusion of limitlessness, harnessing the power of their imaginations to transform their prison into an almost magical kingdom. On the nights when Ma’s captor, known only as Old Nick (Sean Bridgers), visits to rape her, she shields Jack by hiding him in a small wardrobe. Incredibly, Room is based on real events. Donoghue altered key details in the 2008 case of an Austrian woman named Elisabeth Fritzl.
In the picture’s second half, we watch as mother and child struggle to cope with the shock of freedom. If anything, this is the more intricate and wrenching of the two acts. Dublin-born director Lenny Abrahamson (Frank) does a masterful job. In the first half, he employs special cameras to create a suffocating sense of claustrophobia; in the second, he captures the mind-blowing blast of space, movement, color and sound that threatens to overwhelm Jack. Which is why Abrahamson has received the Best Director nomination that Oscarologists predicted would go to Ridley Scott.
He doesn’t miss a detail in the scenes after
Ma brings Jack to her childhood home to
recuperate. We watch Jack negotiate stairs
for the fi rst time; we witness how Ma’s father
(William H. Macy) can’t bring himself to acknowledge
her son; how her mother (Joan
Allen) hangs back and gives Jack the space to
approach her on his own. Then there’s Ma’s
crash. Larson’s so good you can practically
see the storm clouds gather behind her eyes.
Donoghue’s screenplay doesn’t hit a false note
as she charts mother and son’s contrasting reactions
to life outside Room. Which is why it,
too, is up for an Academy Award.
The Academy can nominate up to 10
films for Best Picture and this year selected
just eight. Of the 691 movies domestically released
in 2015, this one, with its modest budget,
disturbing subject matter and largely unknown
leads, beat the odds to be one of those
eight. Abrahamson’s fi lm does the virtually
unimaginable: It stares down inhumanity
and, in the process, emerges as perhaps the
year’s most uplifting cinematic experience.
Room won’t win Best Picture, but it will win
your admiration. Maybe even your heart.
This article appears in The Wellness Issue 2016.

