
Vermont Department of Corrections Commissioner Andy Pallito recalled spotting a young woman on a prison tour; he knew she was addicted to heroin, but she wasn’t getting treated for it. On another occasion, a former inmate who served five years on a marijuana conviction described his crime to Pallito as “possession of a vegetable.”
Pallito has struggled over the years to rein in a DOC budget that has exploded along with the inmate population.
All of that has led him to a conclusion shared by few in his field: Pallito believes that possession of all drugs should be decriminalized and that the War on Drugs should be declared a failure, he told Seven Days. The man who supervises Vermont’s 1,900 prison inmates believes that many of them shouldn’t be behind bars, and that incarceration sets them up for failure.
“Possession of drugs for personal utilization — if somebody is not hurting anyone [else], that should not be a criminal justice matter,” Pallito, 49, said in an interview at his Williston office. “I don’t think anybody can say that putting somebody with an addiction problem through the corrections system is a good idea.”
The DOC commissioner has been following news reports from Portugal, which in 2000 decriminalized all drugs and has since recorded declines in drug abuse and overdose deaths. He’s decided it’s a brave example that Vermont should emulate.
“We should go to the Portugal model, which is to deal with the addiction and not spend the money on the criminal justice system,” Pallito said. “We spend so much money on corrections that could be done differently. The only way to do it is spend less on corrections and more on treatment.”
Pallito may be the first head of a state prison system to publicly advocate against the prosecution of users of heroin, cocaine and other street drugs. He knows of no one among his peers who has stepped forward. Organizations that question the War on Drugs, such as Law Enforcement Against Prohibition — a group of former and current police officers — have not claimed any state corrections administrators as supporters.
“When you’re a corrections commissioner, most people think you’re tough on crime, law and order, and I am — for certain crimes,” Pallito said.
He believes that possession of marijuana should be legal, in any quantity. Possession of all other drugs, provided they are in small quantities for personal use, should not result in a criminal charge but rather a small civil fine, along with a mandate to undergo treatment. In essence, he’d treat all drugs in a way that is consistent with Vermont’s 2013 marijuana decriminalization law, which stipulates that people found with one ounce or less face a $200 fine but no criminal charge.
Pallito stressed two points: Drug dealers should still face criminal charges. And decriminalization should not happen overnight — there aren’t enough drug-treatment providers to handle the effects of such a switch.
He would go even further in decriminalizing drug-related activity. The many people who are charged with drug-addiction-related property crimes, such as theft, would not face prison time.
Currently, more than 500 of Vermont’s 1,900 inmates are in custody for either property crimes or drug possession. Two of those are being incarcerated for marijuana possession.
Freeing such inmates would dramatically reduce the prison population, saving the state several million dollars annually and enabling it to end the controversial program that ships 300 overflow inmates to privately run out-of-state prisons.
Further, Pallito said, decriminalization would allow people to take advantage of effective treatment programs and to avoid criminal convictions that prevent them from rebuilding their lives.
“I think you will find a lot of people in the criminal justice system who have been there for a number of years understand its faults most acutely,” said Chittenden County State’s Attorney T.J. Donovan, who seemed a little taken aback by news of Pallito’s stand. “The best policy is front-end work, and Andy sees that, and it’s consistent with his progressive ideology.”
Pallito is an unlikely resister in the drug war. A New Jersey native, he moved to Vermont after graduating from Saint Peter’s College in 1987 with a degree in accounting. He landed a job working for the former commissioner of the Agency of Human Services, the umbrella agency that includes the DOC.
Among his duties was crafting budget presentations for various Vermont governors; it was the 1990s, when the state’s prison population was on the rise due to tougher drug laws. To make the case that AHS was being financially responsible, Pallito used spreadsheets to demonstrate that the DOC budget was growing faster than other AHS costs.
When Pallito transferred to the DOC in 2001, several departmental higher-ups ribbed him about the spreadsheets. But that didn’t stop him from rising through the ranks. He became deputy commissioner in 2006, and former governor Jim Douglas, a Republican, appointed him commissioner in 2008. He was one of only a few state commissioners who survived the transition to Gov. Peter Shumlin’s Democratic administration.
In the seven years he’s served in the DOC’s top job, Pallito hasn’t been able to reverse its budget trends. Vermont’s inmate population jumped from 1,000 in 1995 to 1,900 today. In the same time period, the department’s budget has grown from $44 million to $159 million. By way of comparison, Vermont spends about $90 million a year on higher education.
Pallito is soft-spoken, to the point of occasionally being difficult to hear. His office is so sparsely decorated that his personal effects there wouldn’t fill a cardboard box. A career government employee who lives with his wife in Jericho, he was initially hesitant to share his views with Seven Days. He does not appear to have come forward to enhance his public profile or because he plans to run for office.
The only other public-safety official in Vermont to make a pronouncement similar to Pallito’s is former Windsor County state’s attorney Robert Sand, who in 2007 declared support for marijuana decriminalization and called for an end to the War on Drugs.
Sand found himself in a political firestorm. Police officials criticized him. In retaliation for Sand’s statement, Douglas announced that he would order Vermont State Police to bypass Sand and take large marijuana cases in Windsor County to the Attorney General’s Office or to federal prosecutors.
In an interview, Sand recalled that he was taken aback. “It’s not particularly fun when other leaders in the state seek to demonize or attack you for comments that were made in good faith,” Sand said.
Sand said he believes that politicians and the public are more willing to consider criminal justice reform now than when he made waves. Treating addiction as a public health issue has become a popular notion for officials across the political spectrum in Vermont, and Shumlin has repeatedly spoken of keeping “non-violent” offenders out of prison.
But that’s as far as most have been willing to go.
Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Sears (D-Bennington), one of the legislature’s most powerful members, said that he opposes decriminalization, which he reasons would only increase demand among addicts. “I don’t know that we’re going to succeed by legalizing or decriminalizing,” Sears said.
Sears praised the commissioner, though, for supporting various initiatives to reduce the inmate population —which has fallen from 2,100 to roughly 1,900 in the past year. Pretrial diversion programs and a $1 million federal grant to reduce inmate recidivism have been positive factors.
“It’s probably the most difficult job in state government,” Sears said of Pallito’s post. “It’s thankless, but at the same time, it’s one of tremendous responsibility. If you release the wrong people, you’re where the buck stops. No matter what happens, he gets blamed.”
Donovan, the Chittenden County state’s attorney who has positioned himself as a leading voice in the criminal justice reform movement, called Pallito a “great partner” with a “very strong understanding on these issues.” But Donovan does not support drug decriminalization, either.
He pointed out that a bill to legalize recreational marijuana use in Vermont didn’t make it to a vote during the past legislative session. And that would have been a baby step toward the decriminalized world that Pallito envisions.
The stalled effort to legalize marijuana, Pallito said, is only “getting in the way” of a bigger debate that he considers inevitable — a push to get users of heroin and other more serious drugs out of the criminal justice system.
“It’s interesting, how long the conversation takes — and this wanton desire to control personal behavior,” Pallito said. “The conversation is moving at the speed of a glacier. I find that surprising. While we are having that conversation, people with addictions aren’t getting any better. There’s been speech after speech. Too many. Well, who are you sending to DOC?”
So many drug addicts are behind bars that the state’s only prison for women, Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility, has had to take steps to curb drug use inside the prison. Inmates who test positive for drugs now stay in Foxtrot, a more restrictive unit, leading many inmates to complain.
Pallito acknowledged that publicly voicing his opinion could put his career in jeopardy. But he said that the time had come for him to speak up for what he believes is best for the state and for addicts.
“There’s fear of political retribution by political attack,” he said. “People can be unforgiving. People get skewered.”
Pallito serves at the pleasure of Shumlin, with whom he has shared his views on decriminalization. “While the governor certainly respects Commissioner Pallito’s right to express his personal views, it is not the administration’s policy to support decriminalizing all drugs,” Shumlin spokesman Scott Coriell said. “The governor looks forward to continuing to work with Commissioner Pallito to implement the critical criminal justice and drug policy reforms under way.”
Though Shumlin announced he will not seek reelection and will step down in January 2017, Pallito said he hopes to stay in state government and is open to keeping his current job — if the next governor has a progressive attitude about criminal justice.
“I’ve always appreciated the reality that I do love this job, but there is a shelf life for me and the state,” Pallito said. “There’s a limit to how much I’m going to be able to accomplish, and a limit to how much the state is going to tolerate me.”
This article appears in Jun 17-22, 2015.


Commissioner Pallito speaks as an adult human being on behalf of other adults. He is right. Government and law enforcement officials in this current system treat people as if they were children or dangerous and heap shame and punishment on people who are just trying to live and cope and manage stuff in a crappy ass world where many jerks and trolls have their way. These people are not and should not be treated as criminals and stigmatized for life. This is not how a just and adult society behaves. Our system relies on fear, excessive authority, and punishing people. It’s callous and lazy and evil.
M. Rake
This is a huge threat to the for-profit prison system. I expect that the lobbyists will push hard against any such idea.
Bravo Commissioner Pallito for being a true public servant — speaking your truth and promoting honest, productive, solution focused ideas. While I agree with you and others may not, at least we have a real, concrete idea from which to start a civil conversation on addiction, criminal justice and what we want our society to be. Thank you. Now, who’s next to step up to the plate in providing good government leadership?
Mr. Donovan’s myopic view is why he’ll never get my vote.
When intelligent, productive, otherwise law-abiding adults choose to engage in something in the privacy of their own homes and that activity is not harming other members of the public it’s counterproductive for government to criminalize that non-harmful behavior. It goes against the notion of a free society.
Outstanding article. Commissioner Palitto should be commended for setting a fine example of how we really should approach mental health and substance abuse challenges from a criminal justice perspective. Commissioner Pallitto’s position is a game changer, lets hope it creates an environment for the necessary change to occur.
Although I don’t condone drug usage, I think finally, someone makes sense. Who better than Commissioner Pallito who has experience and has witnessed first hand a system that is NOT working and is presenting alternatives. I too have worked in government, college educated in Human Services and making it a career and have seen the senseless use of our monies or laws. Why put someone in that hard core prison population for possessing marijuana or who has a drug abuse problem and who really wants to live sober and clean? That doesn’t mean there should not be any retribution for any crimes they committed but let the sentencing fit the minor crimes and not in a prison that houses rapists, murderers, etc. I read somewhere that for each incarceration, the taxpayers pay $25,000+. We need to put this money to better use in education, prevention, mentoring and drug treatment. Unfortunately, these are the budgets that are cut first…when will we listen?
Ha, the rant I posted on facebook won’t fit here. To sum up though, I’m 100% on his side – Portugal has proven a point, decriminalizing drugs across the board makes addiction rates drop – people don’t go nuts and just start popping pills that weren’t doing so before and those who do have a problem have an easier time getting help as the stigma of being ‘criminals’ dies down.
We’re wasting SO MUCH time and money treating non-violent victims as dangerous criminals. Why are we so supportive of alcoholism but not drug addiction? Many people drink, we think that’s fine and not a big deal – when people go overboard and end up with a problem we support them getting treatment and remind them they have an addiction which is a hard thing to break and takes bravery and learning to do so. We treat sugar addiction the same way when working with obesity. Why should drugs be so terrifying and different? I’m not saying the legality of any crimes committed while under the influence should change – assault is still assault even if you were on PCP and didn’t know what you were doing, was still your choice to take it. But come on if we look at it black and white it’s a simple question:
Which would you, as a tax payer, rather put your money toward? A) locking up drug users in prison where they may or may not get treatment and will likely find it nearly impossible to rebuild their lives to be valuable citizens again after release? or B) put that money (that’s collected from you whether you like it or not) to treat the addiction and help addicts find their feet again?
If only it was that easy saying that drugs users don’t hurt anyone else but themselves, but the fact is it’s not. Tell that to the countless people who have either personally or had someone they know experience an accident caused by some piece of garbage who was too impaired to drive because of drugs. How about that young high school girl in Rutland who was killed by a guy who was messed up out of his mind on drugs, only to have his vehicle pin the girl against a wall right as her father was picking her up from work. Yeah, let’s just assume that all drug users do so in the comfort of their own homes, and don’t go out on the roads posing a threat to innocent lives.
You know sometimes I question how Governor Scumlin has been able to fool people into gaining support for him all these years. But it’s small minded liberal responses to articles like these that shed a little bit of light on the types of folks he has been able to persuade.
wow, a man with common sense. we need more people like this man that can open their eyes and see the real problems.
Yes to decriminalization. No to treatment! Why? Because no treatment has ever been shown to be effective against drug addiction. They only serve to make it worse, typically by telling the victim that they have a disease and/or they are ‘powerless’ to their ‘cravings’ and that only leads to more drug use, crime, and suicide. So yeah I think this is great, minus the treatment. Just leave drug users alone and they’ll leave you alone. As for the threats of doing drugs and raping your children, that is just the 12 Step cults holding you hostage to their mischief. Also people who commit property crimes whether ‘drug-addiction-related’ or not must face punishment! Again, ‘treatment’ has never never never been shown to be effective in the least for reducing crime. (Why? Because drug use, drug ‘addiction’ behavior, and crime are all choices of free will.)
There ARE effective drug treatment programs. As a retired probation officer, I have seen such programs work. While 12 step programs are not really designed to treat drug addiction, places like Delancey Street Foundation (look it up) do work. How one can say a heroin or meth addict is operating under free will seems to deny the definition of ‘addict’. I think one of the most telling statements in this article is the fact that Corrections (should be called Punishment, nothing is being corrected) budget far exceeds Education budget. Never forget that almost all prisoners are released at some time, and they might move in next door to you. And what has society (you) done for them while they were incarcerated?
Bravo to Commissioner Pallito! We need forward thinking leaders like this in all states. Let’s put the money on the “front end”! It’ll take a lot of individuals to help change public perspective. Once that is acheived, we can hope to change public policy. It’s a small wave of a movement, but it is indeed a movement! http://www.tinhihlasvegas.info
My son has an addiction problem please read my petition and sign. I am just a mom stunned by our justice system. 70 years fora nonviolent crime–cost 5 million dollars. https://www.change.org/p/jerry-brown-reduce-my-son-s-sentence?recruiter=3209050&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink
This is a public official with true courage. I agree with him one hundred percent in regards to his position on the drug war. Thanks!