Speaking by conference call with the Vermont Senate, chief fiscal officer Stephen Klein warned that the resulting economic downturn could rob state coffers of hundreds of millions of dollars in the final three months of the current fiscal year, which ends on June 30.
“A lot of it is the questions we all don’t know, which is, is this a medium-term event? Is it a long-term event?” he said. “Nobody really knows how serious this could be.”
Noting that the state’s Education Fund alone could be shorted $45 million over the next three months, Klein argued that next year’s budget could look even more gruesome. “You realize if this goes two quarters or three or four, the numbers get staggering,” he said.
The legislature’s Joint Fiscal Office, which Klein oversees, has been working with Gov. Phil Scott’s economists to project revenue losses, but Klein cautioned that any estimates he could offer were necessarily uncertain, given how much is unknown about the depth and duration of the crisis. “This is a little bit like throwing darts at a dartboard,” he said.
Klein’s office is working on a web page to provide the public with its latest forecasts, he said, but even that could prove problematic. “The dilemma is that every time we put a number on the web, people use it the next day — and then the next day the number changes by $10 or $15 million,” he said.
That uncertainty could prompt lawmakers to reconsider their budgeting process.
Typically, the legislature sends the governor a budget for the next fiscal year before adjourning in May. This year, Senate President Pro Tempore Tim Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) suggested during the call, the legislature may want to pass a “three-month skeleton budget” to get the state through the first quarter of the 2021 fiscal year. It could then stay in session and develop a “more realistic” budget over the summer for the final three quarters of the year.
“At the moment, it seems hard to believe that we’ll be able to pass a well-informed budget by mid-May or even early June,” Ashe said.
Senators also discussed whether the legislature should delegate new spending authorities to a smaller group of lawmakers in order to provide a more nimble response to the crisis. One option could be to give those powers to the Emergency Board, which includes the chairs of the legislature’s four tax and appropriations panels — known as the “money committees” — plus the governor. Another option could be the Joint Fiscal Committee, which includes the money committee chairs and six other legislators.
“The more authority we give, the more we’re delegating away from all members of the Senate and House to a small group of people,” Ashe said. “So it’s that balancing act.”
Sen. Dick McCormack (D-Windsor) expressed reservations about ceding too much power to too few legislators. “I understand the logic behind it,” he said. “But there is a principle that we can delegate authority; we cannot delegate responsibility. And I would hope that we would be very reluctant to take what are essentially functions of the entire legislature and concentrate them in a committee.”
McCormack added, “It’s unconstitutional to delegate responsibility.”
During his briefing of the Senate, Klein listed several key concerns about the state’s tax collections during the current fiscal year:
- The federal government’s decision to delay income tax collections from April to July could shift $145 million in state revenue from this fiscal year to the next. “So we’ll have to figure out a way to bridge that gap in the current fiscal year,” Klein said.
- The state’s General Fund would be down $40 million due a drop in the state’s rooms and meals tax, as well as its income tax, but a “one-time event” — the sale of a major Vermont business — brought in $35 million in unanticipated payments.
- The Transportation Fund is off $30 to $40 million due to declines in the state’s gasoline and purchase and use taxes. “How does that affect our spring, summer road season?” Klein asked, noting that transportation reserves amount to just $13 to $14 million. “There’s gonna have to be reductions in activity.”
- The Education Fund is down $35 to $45 million because of reductions in the rooms and meals, purchase and use, and sales taxes. It has a $37 million reserve.
At the same time, the state is already considering $40 to $70 million in additional spending related to the outbreak: unemployment assistance, childcare and foster programs, public health initiatives, and support for hospitals. The legislature is also considering assembling a recovery package in the coming weeks or months.
Sen. Randy Brock (R-Franklin), who had requested the briefing, said at its conclusion that he wished he hadn’t heard Klein’s dire forecast. “I know I asked for this information last week, and I think I regret it at this point,” he joked.
Disclosure: Tim Ashe is the domestic partner of Seven Days publisher and coeditor Paula Routly. Find our conflict-of-interest policy here: sevendaysvt.com/disclosure.
Related Stories
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
With Vermont and the nation in a virtual shutdown, hundreds of millions in lost revenue is a massive under-estimate.
If things dont get better soon, I wont be paying the next installment of my property tax.
Im not going to be the only one choosing family survival over the teachers union.
There goes your Ed fund.
Wait, I thought the goal was to have fewer people driving their dirty gas cars? Wish granted…(The Transportation Fund is off $30 to $40 million due to declines in the state’s gasoline and purchase and use taxes.) I’m sure the Rainy Day Fund will cover it all….Oh wait, our Montpelier Super Majority was spending beyond our means much before this….Go home Tim, the rest, we can not afford your “solutions” nor your salaries. If there was pork to cut it should have been done much before this year as our citizens have been financially hurting for many years.
I’m sure the MAGA hatters on the Right will be howling for more tax cuts. They don’t want to pay for anything, they are freeloaders of the worst kind. They have no room to whine when Trump has blown a massive hole in the deficit with idiotic military spending and tax giveaways for his Mar-a-lago buddies.
“Socialism” for the 1% and Corporate America, merciless, austerity capitalism for the rest of us.
I was thinking that Northoldender may have switched to a new script. And, is a “MAGA hater” someone who hates MAGA?
To the article, I’m in the camp of believing the State finances and overall economic health was and is hanging by a thread.
I love McCormack’s quote: “It’s unconstitutional to delegate responsibility.”
The worst is yet to come, unfortunately.
Looks like tough decisions ahead. Time to set priorities based on fairness and need, not on what special interests might desire.
If were going to be all in, which is the best way to get through difficulties, might well be the time to make hitherto avoided adjustments to our pension system in order to free up funds for critical needs.
Did somebody say pay cuts AND tax increases for the rich? Sounds good to me!!!
After years of profligate state spending, and the introduction of new state programs almost every year that suck up more and more of taxpayers heard earned income it’s not surprising that any kind of external disaster, in this case a pandemic, would result in dire financial straits for Vermonters. Had the dimwits in Montpelier been more fiscally responsible we would be in better, though probably not great, shape.
With its anti-business, anti-development philosophy, Vermont has created a state that looks like one big forested park but one where most people are living paycheck to paycheck, paying exorbitant prices for housing with stagnant wages, and unable to save for emergencies such as Covid-19.
We’ve created a state where most people are unable to provide economic security for themselves and their families. We wanted a state that eschewed progress and now we’re seeing the result. It’s not going to be pretty.
But hey, we can all go outside and look at a pristine, unused and undeveloped field of weeds as we and our neighbors go broke.
For those who think state spending is out of control, here is a fact check. The percent of total personal income spent on all state and local taxes is the same as it was 20 years ago. Facts matter.
In any case, I am interested in exactly what the naysayers think should be cut from state government. It is easy to call for generic cuts. Step up and tell us what state spending is unnecessary.
Interesting perspective Doug.
Are you trying to equate a roughly equal % of income paid in taxes over the last 20 years to mean that the state hasn’t exponentially expanded state spending over the same time?
Yep Hoffer, facts do matter and state spending was out of control 20 years ago too. If you honestly don’t believe that state policy, state spending and our high taxation are making this state unaffordable, then it really is time for a new auditor – one that’s able to put two and two together and use common sense and logic rather than extreme left wing “feel good” prog nonsense.. Further, Doug, snotty, snarky, nasty responses to constituents isn’t effective in persuading anyone that you are right. It just points out the kind of person you are. So now Dougie, how about you present the facts that you have that this state is not overspending, that taxes aren’t high in comparison to a average wages and that Vermont isn’t becoming more and more unaffordable for most Vermonters. You could at least try and hide your contempt for anyone and everyone that doesn’t agree with you, but then again, that isnt your way is it?
Eliminate the Auditor’s office. It would save millions of dollars in taxpayer money. And it would spare the environment millions of cubic pounds of hot air.
@Doug Hoffer. Facts do matter. The top tax rate is similar but you did not mention the income levels when the tiered rates kick in. In 2012 the top rate kicked in on married couples earning $389000 whereas in 2019 it was around $243000. Seems like the state is taking more in taxes.
Let’s see. Expected shortage of up to $45 million in the education fund. The fund has a $37 million reserve balance. Reserve gone. The NEA has told the state that teachers will be paid their full salary for the year. There goes the $37 million reserve. Estimated increase in education budget next year, around 6%. Estimated increase in property taxes, only god knows, maybe. The governor said we are all in this together. He should have said that we are all in this together, unless you are a member of the NEA. The NEAs boss, the Vermont taxpayers, are more than happy to pay your share of the “we are all in this together”.