The news came one day after Mayor Seth Leonard announced he would step down before his term is up to avoid any conflicts of interest involving his new job with the Vermont Housing Finance Agency. His term would have run until 2021.
Both contenders for the part-time job are relatively new to the city council. Neither is running with a party affiliation.
Lott was elected in March, and Covey was elected in 2017.
Lott is a business analyst. As mayor, she would use her professional background in operations and data analysis, Lott said in a campaign announcement.
“I believe in fiscal responsibility, investment in our neighborhoods and infrastructure, maintaining affordable housing, and transparency in operations,” the announcement read.
Covey is chief of staff for Secretary of State Jim Condos. He said in an interview Tuesday that his day job gives him a strong understanding of governance. He would strive to ensure development occurs at a measured pace that protects and promotes affordable housing.
“I will work to bring the voices of all Winooski residents to the table,” Covey said.
After Leonard steps down January 28, Councilor Nicole Mace will fill in as interim mayor until a new mayor is elected in March. She has said she will not run for the position, and she will give up her council slot when her term ends in March.
Counting the mayor, there are five people on the Winooski City Council, including Hal Colston.
As his colleagues made their intentions known, Colston said Tuesday he was not jumping into the race for mayor. Instead, he plans to make a run for the state legislature in 2020, and in the meantime he will focus on council work. “I’m not going anywhere,” Colston said.
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Mr. Covey advocates measured pace development and affordable housing? Housing in Winooski is going to be very affordable because the F-35s are going to make living and working there miserable due to noise from the F-35s. Anyone who can afford to live/work elsewhere will avoid Winooski.
Winooski Mayor needs to have skills to deal with disinvestment resulting from the noise of F-35s thundering over the area. Also will need to create an extraordinary emergency response plan. The F-35s are deadly weapons that crash, and they are going to be flown by Afterburner Boys, increasing the statistical risk of pilot errors and maintenance mistakes. https://vtdigger.org/tag/guard-series/
Winooski has had noise from planes for years and the F-35s are going to make it worse
Both of these candidates are extremely exciting. Glad to see Winooski politics moving beyond the old guard that held the reins of power for so long.
The noise zone map for the F35s is now due out in February or March. How will Winooski handle losing acceptable residential housing for thousands of people? The commercial developers seem to be really happy and are spending lots of time and energy promoting the Guard… follow the money.
Oh these chicken little snowflakes! So entertaining with their luddite childish views of the world. There will be no F-35 crashes. Furthermore the world will little note nor long remember the arrival of the F-35s. And if anyone moves out of the city because of the noise (which will not happen) there will be a buyer for their home in seconds because Winooski will continue to be a great place to reside. Guaranteed.
“The air force turned its back on pursuing the F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) fighter due to a recent Taiwan National Security Council report. It indicated the stealth fighter was too exorbitant and untested in real combat to be a pragmatic choice…”
The F-35 is a boondoggle, corporate profits for Lockheed. Winooski and other towns are sacrificed in the name of good jobs for people who won’t live in the noise zones. Meanwhile, there are thousands of good jobs this exorbitant investment could create that would build a strong community, investments in green energy, clean water, affordable housing, genetics, stem cell therapy, farming clean food and hemp, cyber security!
F-35 is not a winner, not at all. F-35 made the “worst plane” list. Burlington gets a loser that is corporate welfare. Thousands of resident’s homes, and at least one school, will be made uninhabitable so Congress can pay Lockheed billions to make it, work on all the problems, and maintain it. The skies over Burlington will be training air for a plane that is flawed, placing all our homes in the experimental zone. And for the record, they do and they have crashed, fortunately in remote areas.
“F-35 Joint Strike Fighter:
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint is years late, grotesquely over budget and not the aircraft likely to ever deliver what its designers originally promised. The F-35 is a case of massive over ambition to develop one base airframe that can be adapted to replace half-dozen specialized jets. The result is an expensive jack-of-all-trades, but a master of none.
Moreover, the requirements for the F-35 were set at a time when future threats were unclear. The requirements were set to fight in an environment that was less intense than what might be expected had the Soviet Union not collapsed, but more strenuous than what is required for a low end conflict like Syria or Iraq. Those who set the requirements did not anticipate the reemergence of China or the anti-access/area denial threats we are now starting to face.
The result is an aircraft that is not equal to meeting the emerging challenges facing the nation in the Western Pacific.
Dave Majumdar is the defense editor for The National Interest.”
Business
Introducing the 5 Worst U.S. Fighter Jets of All Time (And Yes, the F-35 Made the List)
The National Interest Dave Majumdar,The National Interest Wed, Dec 26, 2018