“All three of us are actively door knocking and engaging with constituents and voters. There’s a lot of energy and electricity in the ward,” said incumbent Sharon Bushor, an independent who has served on the city council for 32 years.
Bushor, a 73-year-old retired medical technician, has often aligned with the Progressive Party but was snubbed in December when it endorsed her challenger — Zoraya Hightower, a 29-year-old environmental and development professional who serves on the city Development Review Board but has never held elected office in Burlington. The third candidate, Democrat Jillian Scannell, is a 22-year-old senior at UVM who is president of the university’s Student Government Association.
Each says she is best suited to represent the ward roughly bounded by Willard Street, Main Street, Centennial Woods and the Winooski River. It is home to many student renters, as well as longtime homeowners and renters.
Hightower moved to Burlington four years ago to take a job at Resonance, a global consulting firm. She has a master’s degree from Yale and two bachelor’s degrees from the University of Tulsa. She would focus on affordable housing, better transit and growing the city housing stock with “smart infill projects that aren’t huge.”
Her proposals include a landlord registry over and above what is now required under Burlington’s minimum housing code enforcement program, which oversees inspection of the city’s roughly 10,000 rental units.
Current rules don’t have enough teeth to hold landlords accountable when they fail to maintain their properties, Hightower said, and the threat of losing a license to rent a property might help improve standards and give “tenants more rights — and also protection.”
“I think a lot of folks in Ward 1 feel that we’re losing our housing stock in terms of quality,” Hightower said. She’s a landlord herself, renting out one room in her River Watch condo on Hildred Drive. That gives her a unique perspective among the candidates on the issue. “I think there’s a lot to be said for doing it responsibly,” Hightower said of acting as a landlord.
One of the more controversial housing issues in Ward 1 is an existing ordinance that limits the number of renters in certain properties to no more than four unrelated adults — with some caveats. The measure was approved in response to quality-of-life concerns about overpacked student apartments, cars parked on lawns, trash and rowdy parties.
While Hightower said she’s not a big fan of the ordinance, she would not vote to throw it out without new rules in place to address some of those same issues.
In addition to knocking on all the doors in the ward, Hightower’s campaign has organized potlucks and house parties to get the word out. Why should people vote for her?
“I think I am the most likely to bring about change,” Hightower said. “I think that I have enough experience to really, like, wrestle with the issues.”
She also noted that as a woman of color, she would bring that perspective forward. “I think my opponents are going to keep talking to the same people and coming up with the same solutions, and I think it’s time for a slightly more inclusive stance,” Hightower said.
Bushor also supports additional licensing for landlords and said she has already been working on an ordinance that she hopes to push forward if reelected. When asked about Hightower’s proposal, Bushor suggested hers came first and said, “that’s not OK, to come forward and take someone else’s initiative.”
The current system of inspections and fines is not strict enough, Bushor said. “Licensing would mean, OK, if you ignore the city and you are not working with us, we could pull your license.”
She strongly supports the no more than four unrelated occupants ordinance, and noted that it includes a provision to allow renters in some cases to go over the limit of four if they can prove they are a “functional family.”
The ordinance “has worked really well,” Bushor said. Before it passed “we had structures that had far too many cars, far too much trash.” She said a repeal would be “devastating” for Ward 1.
Bushor said she, too, would work for more affordable housing and has long been sensitive to the needs and struggles of working people.
“I don’t come from money,” said Bushor, explaining that she grew up in Massachusetts, where her father worked as a chauffeur for a wealthy family who didn’t compensate him well.
When she graduated from UVM, she was the first person in her family to earn a college degree. She took a job at what is now the UVM Medical Center. “I felt guilty; I was making $20 more a week than my dad,” she recalled.
A resident of East Avenue, Bushor has two grown children and one grandchild. She said she has the experience to serve the neighborhood well on the council.
“I know the ward. I have experience. I work well with all parties,” she said. “I have brought about some significant policies that have bettered the city and the ward.”
Bushor also defended her recent vote in favor of reinvesting funds in Burlington Telecom. Although the measure failed, she saw it as a way to make a limited investment and keep a seat on the board of the formerly city-owned telecom company, which Burlington sold last year after a controversial $17 million bailout a decade prior.
Scannell would also support a repair-and-deduct ordinance and landlord registry, and noted that one of the people she met while out door knocking was a student who showed her the overflowing dumpster behind his rental. “They’ve been calling the landlord, and the dumpster behind their apartment complex hasn’t been changed in over two months,” Scannell said.
Like her opponents, Scannell said affordable housing is a key platform. From time to time, housing advocates have proposed that juniors and seniors at UVM be required to live on campus — as are first- and second-year students — to free up off-campus apartments.
Scannell, who lives in an off-campus rental on South Williams Street, would not support that: “I don’t think they should be required to live on campus.”
That being said, there should be more opportunities for upperclassmen to live on campus if they choose to, Scannell said. She also pledged to work hard to advance the city’s interests in the next round of housing talks between the city and the state university.
“I think that in the upcoming negotiation, if I’m elected to city council, I can be a crucial voice in that room,” Scannell said.
An environmental studies major from Rutland, Mass., Scannell worked to help open the new food pantry for students on the UVM campus and said as a city councilor, she would seek solutions to reduce car commuting in and out of the city, among other things.
She has no plans to move out of Burlington after graduation, and if elected, would serve her full term, she said.
“My responsibility would be to the people of Burlington, and I would absolutely stay,” Scannell said.
Correction, February 27, 2020: A previous version of this story mischaracterized Hightower’s position on the Burlington Telecom reinvestment decision.





Something has got to be done about the slumlord problem as well as freeing up apartment space for the lower income people who actually live here. Students should live on campus. Why is Bushor just now saying she has an idea about landlords? She’s had all these years to do something and just because somebody else wants to do something she says they stole her idea? Whoever has the best ideas and plan on doing something should be the ones that win
Yes, we need truly affordable housing.
If I could vote for Ms. Bushor, I would, but I live in another ward.
I don’t think she’s the problem.
I don’t agree with every decision she’s made, but then again, I don’t agree with every decision I’ve made!
As a voter in Ward 1, I’m confident in my decision that Zoraya is the best option. She has the fire and passion as well as housing and environmental experience.
She also lives with her friend in a recently purchased condo … does that make her a landlord? Lol…. I guess…. ?
While Sharon would be my second option, I don’t think it’s fair for a politician to hold position for longer than 15 years. Let’s get some new blood flowin’ folks. Why doesn’t Sharon just be a mentor? She’s had her time to shine… 30 years in fact.
Why is Jillian running on literally the same platform as Zoraya. Seems like another case of a privileged white woman piggy backing off the idea of a black woman & seeking to neglect people of color of an opportunity… but OK girl get that Democratic Party money and plaster the town in your materials.
🐸☕️
Sharon is the Bernie Sanders of City Council. Parties don’t tell her how to vote. She does her own research, goes directly to sources, talks with her constituents, and makes up her own mind. She works hard for her ward, spending more time at city meetings than any other councilor. Her institutional memory is invaluable, and you know the saying about fooling somebody twice? — not Sharon. Such a dedicated public servant comes along rarely. I hope her ward sends her back. She works for all of us.
When I moved to Ward 1 from another Ward in Burlington years ago I was skeptical of my councilwoman at first but quickly witnessed her doing her due diligence and standing up for common sense and humanity in the face of multiple corrupt mayors and their cohorts on the council. Bushor is amazing to be honest!
I am so critical of politicians but her record and demeanor won me over. She listens. Also I’d take a known quantity who can stand on her own over those challengers any day.
This article makes me wonder about the writer’s motives using that photo especially. She’s a cute tiny woman who smiles a lot not a glowering tower.
Sigh. Another election, incumbents and newcomers talking about the need for action on, to pick an example, the serious housing/landlords issue. YEARS have passed with little effective change. What’s wrong? Is it so difficult to craft and implement effective and fair (to both renters and landlords) laws which target the key problems which have been endlessly talked about over many YEARS? I think not. If this were a for-profit company addressing a similar task, to take more than a month or so to hammer out a well documented set of actions would suggest incompetence. The legislation does not have to be overly complex and sweeping in scope. Simply Start by addressing the most egregious issues- those seem to be very well known, given the YEARS over which they’ve been discussed. Include hard hitting and rapidly addressed penalties for both sides. There are costs, of course, likely including additional inspectors. This would of course be part of the study and transparent to all. So, councilors, care to offer up reasons why this can’t be done in relatively short order? Or will more wasted YEARS pass?
Sharon Bushor has experience and institutional memory that is invaluable on the City Council. I am in another ward so cannot vote for her. But a new young woman Councilor in ward 3 has proved to be a disaster. Also the City needs to make low interest loans available for housing stock which they used to do. Too many laws to bring housing into gentirifcation levels need to at least offer financial support to do it.
Over the past several years I have witnessed Sharon Bushor patiently sitting through countless hours of council meeting and always making careful, well thought out deliberations before making her vote. She is more than capable, well deserving of our votes, and in my opinion I think it’s a shame she hasn’t run for mayor of this City. She definitely knows more about what goes on in city politics and behind the scenes dramas than most. It would be a shame to retire such a font of knowledge and determination. Her energy has not diminished over the years and now she has more time to devote fully to being a progressive (she reflects most of the progressive party’s core values) representative of the constituents in her Ward 1.
Fact: Creating a landlord registry will change NOTHING. The city already has a registry of units and who owns them. Making another data base will not mean anything.