A city water pipe Credit: Sasha Goldstein
As Election Day approaches, Department of Public Works Assistant Director Megan Moir keeps a section of the city’s water main nearby. She can show off the inside of the century-old metal pipe, which is caked with bulges of rust-colored accretion known as tuberculation.

Burlington residents will vote on an $8.3 million bond Tuesday, and the pipe, which was removed from Pitkin Street earlier this year, offers a graphic example of the work left to do on the city’s aging water infrastructure.

While Queen City citizens have kept a close eye on controversial ballot measures surrounding the Burlington Town Center redevelopment, ballot question No. 2 has largely passed under the radar. Moir attributes the lack of attention to an “out of sight, out of mind” mentality: “You don’t care about [the issue] until the water pipe breaks,” she said.

The measure also hasn’t faced vocal opposition. Because the bond will be repaid through an increase in water rates, it requires only a majority to pass. (Ballot item No. 1, which approves paving and other capital projects, will be covered by municipal taxes and requires a two-thirds majority “yes” vote for passage.)

But for those familiar with the city’s water pipelines, the plan has been a long time coming. Currently, 42 percent of Burlington’s pipes are older than 75 years old; 

Burlington water main age Credit: Department of Public Works
25 percent are more than a century old. The Department of Public Works has also received numerous citizen complaints of discolored drinking water, according to DPW Director Chapin Spencer. The rust buildups don’t pose a health hazard, Spencer noted, but they can add an unsightly brown tinge to the water. Clogged lines can also affect water pressure, a potential liability for the fire department as they connect to the water hydrants.

“We all deserve to have a water system that’s more resilient than that,” Spencer said. “Our system has grown and we have deferred significant reinvestment — and that is coming starkly to an end.”

The ballot measure is the result of a three-year process developing a longterm water system plan. DPW touts the bond as a proactive investment in Burlington’s infrastructure. To make the improvements, the city will be using Sanexen Aqua-Pipe, a technology to reline — rather than replace — the water mains. If approved, city workers would start next summer cleaning the pipes using high-pressure water jetting, then threading the lining through the pipes. The plastic liner is sealed to the pipe and hardened with hot water.

The new process is much less disruptive to city streets, Moir said. Relining the pipes requires digging access points as little as every 600 feet, whereas open-trench replacement can shut down a street for days at a time.

Once the lines are installed, the city would go forward with paving those same stretches of street. Repaving can weaken or even break subterranean waterlines, so fixing city streets while relining can help avoid digging up newly repaved surfaces, Spencer said. Moir pointed out a dozen locations where water mains broke just months after paving, forcing the city to dig up the street, repair the pipes and then repave.

Pipe work along King Street this fall Credit: File: Sasha Goldstein
It’s the first time that the department has actively coordinated water pipe repairs with the city’s aboveground planning, Moir said.

Much of the paving money, though, is in ballot item No. 1: A $27.5 million city bonding request for capital improvements, including new firetrucks, street repaving and sidewalk fixes.

“By putting the work together, we’re reducing disruptions,” Spencer said.
If the $8.3 million water bond passes, it would allow for the relining of eight miles of the city’s 110 miles of water pipeline — at a cost of about $177 a linear foot. The bond would mean slightly higher annual bills for ratepayers. Owners of a single-family home should expect to pay an additional $10 next year, increasing to about $30 annually in fiscal year 2020. The initiative would begin next summer.

Ongoing investment is also needed. According to DPW’s calculations, the city would have to invest $2.3 million annually for the next 25 years to ensure that pipes are replaced, or relined, every 88 years. Moir said her department is looking into ways to cover such a plan without large tax increases.

Previously, Burlington has been forced to take a piecemeal approach to correct short-term issues. During the winter of 2014-2015, frost penetrated more than five feet below the ground to the water pipelines, resulting in what DPW employees dubbed “frostpocalypse:” 48 line breaks, Spencer said, which left hundreds of residents without water.

Moir acknowledged that the city’s work thus far has not been “without hiccups.” Residents complained of a lack of communication when the department repaired water lines on Pitkin Street and King Street this summer. But the new equipment is more pliable than the old pipes, meaning fewer breaks and less costly night and weekend work during the cold winter months, Spencer said.

“These are very real realities,” Spencer said. “This measure is responding to all the people who have been impacted by this aging infrastructure. We need a system that is resilient and can deliver 24/7.”

Got something to say?

Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Katie Jickling is a Seven Days staff writer.

3 replies on “Main Concern: Burlington Voters to Decide on Water Infrastructure”

  1. THIS IS A VERY REAL NEED THAT THE CITY HAS. IT WILL ONLY REPAID 8 miles of the 117 miles of road. Vote for #2

    However when you get to #4, the TIF, that is a debt the city does not need, and the developer, just like all developers before Sinex, and like Farrell and SD Ireland today, pay for the streets and then GIVE them to the city. Sinex even wants us to BUY the STREETS from him. With $150 MIL profit, as stated on his website.
    (devonwood financial) he surely can AFFORD to PAY for our 4 streets.
    Don’t you think it is better to vote Yes on #2 for our water pipes and NO on #4.

  2. I voted yes for the water pipes and no on 3 and 4. #2 was the only one I voted yes on. I’m not giving the city executive and council that gave into Sinex on every major point a penny for anything. I will vote out everyone I can in March. But why, should we ask, is special money needed for the water pipes? Isn’t this a normal cost for a city that should have been planned for? When they’re asking us for money for streets and pipes, we might well ask why that money hasn’t been set aside from earlier tax revenues.

  3. @ Aslop: You should be asking Clavelle and Kiss, the Prog mayors, that question: why wasn’t any money set aside for pipe replacement? Why did they waste money on BT? Why didn’t they set aside money for city employee pension obligations? Why did they allow the Town Center Mall to rot away? Why did they allow the city parking garages to rot away? And why did they build no housing in Burlington for over 20 years? Why did they leave these problems for their successor, Mayor Weinberger, to have to deal with?

Comments are closed.