The corner office in Sen. Bernie Sanders‘ presidential campaign headquarters has two desks — one for the candidate and one for his closest political adviser: Jane O’Meara Sanders, who doubles as his wife.
Last month, she took in the view of Burlington’s City Hall Park three stories below and reflected on his choice to seek the Democratic nomination.
“The hardest part was making a decision, I think,” she said.
Many political spouses steer clear of the day-to-day hustle of the campaign trail and the slow grind of government work, but that’s never been O’Meara Sanders’ MO. Since she introduced herself to her future husband the night he was elected Burlington mayor in 1981, O’Meara Sanders has played a crucial role in his public and political lives.
Soon after the mayor took over Burlington City Hall, she became the founding director of the Mayor’s Youth Office, working for the man she’d marry in 1988. After he won a seat in the U.S. House in 1990, O’Meara Sanders spent five years working in a voluntary capacity in his congressional office. According to her LinkedIn page, she served during that period as “press secretary, chief of staff or policy analyst as needed.”
And when the congressman was up for reelection, O’Meara Sanders worked as his television ad buyer, earning roughly $30,000 in commissions during the 2002 and 2004 elections, the Brattleboro Reformer reported at the time.
Now that Sanders is seeking the Democratic nomination, his wife continues to lead the parade.
“Bernie, Jeff and I are the people who run the campaign,” she said last month, referring to Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ former chief of staff and current campaign manager.
At the time, O’Meara Sanders said her role entailed doing “whatever comes up that has to get done until we’re fully staffed up.”
“But as time goes on, I’ll be, hopefully, out of the administrative part of it and, really, as always, deal with strategy and fundraising,” she said.
That worries some Burlingtonians who have crossed paths with O’Meara Sanders in her other professional roles — particularly the seven years she spent as president of Burlington College.
“As much as I want Bernie to win, the idea of her in the White House or of having any power at all is deeply disturbing,” says former faculty member Genese Grill, who was fired by O’Meara Sanders and who calls her style “extremely dictatorial.”
Other critics question whether she was responsible for the school’s near-demise last year, when the cash-strapped college found itself struggling to meet payroll. They say she over-leveraged the institution by borrowing $10 million to finance a risky campus expansion, assuming she could make payments by increasing enrollment and donations during an economic downturn.
Grill’s view is hardly the consensus of those who worked with O’Meara Sanders.
Seven Days spoke with more than half a dozen former and current Burlington College board members and several more former faculty and staff. Nearly every one of them praised what they called O’Meara Sanders’ “visionary” approach to transforming the 44-year-old college from its scrappy roots to a first-class institution.
“Jane had a lot of vision and a lot of energy, and she saw Burlington College growing into something bigger,” says Ben & Jerry’s global director of social mission Rob Michalak, who served on the board during O’Meara Sanders’ tenure.
So why was she ousted in the fall of 2011?
At the time, she and board members publicly maintained that her departure was entirely voluntary, though they privately admitted relations had soured in the preceding months. Things came to a head in late September, when the board added “Removal of the President” to a meeting agenda.
After submitting her letter of resignation, O’Meara Sanders told Seven Days simply, “I feel it’s a good time to leave.”
To this day, the reason for her exit remains a state secret. She declined requests for an interview on the subject, and the Sanders campaign refused to comment.
“Her departure is kind of kept under seal. I have no idea. None,” maintains Pomerleau Real Estate senior vice president Yves Bradley, who joined the board in 2013 and now serves as its chair. “It’s just not talked about.”
It certainly was in the community. At the time, many speculated that O’Meara Sanders hadn’t lived up to Burlington College’s ambitious goal to raise $6 million in a capital campaign.
A year and a half earlier, in May 2010, O’Meara Sanders had convinced board members to buy one of Burlington’s premier properties: a 32-acre stretch of mostly undeveloped land between Lake Champlain and North Avenue. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington had been eager to sell off the parcel to pay a $20 million settlement related to sexual abuse allegations.
“She was the one who really sought that out, dealt with the diocese right from the get-go and was very aggressive about doing so,” says board member Patrick Mahoney, a retired orthopedic surgeon from South Burlington. “I thought she did a very good job.”
But in order to finance the new campus, Burlington College had to borrow $10 million — $6.5 million in tax-exempt bonds held by People’s United Bank and another $3.5 million loan from the diocese itself. Even proponents of the deal say it was a stretch.
“I liken it to a young couple buying a house of their dreams and then paying 50 percent of their combined salary to afford it,” says Michael Luck, a fundraising consultant who served at the time as the school’s vice president for development and alumni affairs. Everybody knew that, like the young couple, the school would be “eating peanutbutter sandwiches and macaroni and cheese for a while,” Luck says.
Burlington activist Robin Lloyd, who served on the board, says she supported O’Meara Sanders’ hiring, in part, because, “We felt that her connection with Bernie would be helpful, certainly in terms of fundraising.” But when the college had to come up with the cash to make its payments, O’Meara Sanders didn’t pull through, she says.
“She was very confident and gave good presentations to the board, but, frankly, she didn’t raise money,” Lloyd says.
According to Lloyd, O’Meara Sanders’ departure was prompted by fundraising woes, but also by “an incident where she spoke rudely to some students.” No other board member would speak on the record about the alleged incident, but one person purportedly involved says the president “blew up” at two staff members and a student during a tour of the new campus, prompting a staff member to file a grievance with the board.
“What occurred with Jane’s departure, that’s not something that anybody wanted to do,” then-board chairman Adam Dantzscher says cryptically. “That was duty and bylaws and procedures and policies.”
Whatever the reason, it’s caused Sanders the senator plenty of political headaches.
Last September, local gas station magnate and Republican provocateur Skip Vallee spent $10,000 running a 60-second attack ad on WCAX-TV focusing on O’Meara Sanders’ departure from Burlington College. He characterized the $200,000 severance package she received over two years as a “golden parachute” of the sort Sen. Sanders often rails against.
“I think he’s a big hypocrite,” Vallee says.
The Maplefields owner also criticizes O’Meara Sanders and her daughter, Carina Driscoll, for their paid work, more than a decade ago, on Sanders’ reelection campaigns. In addition to the $30,000 O’Meara Sanders made, Driscoll earned $65,002 for her work as campaign manager, fundraiser and database manager during the 2000 and 2004 cycles, the Reformer reported.
Vallee calls the payments “a money-laundering scheme” designed “to take campaign money and put it in your own bank account,” noting that the House subsequently voted to ban the practice. Weaver defended the arrangement at the time, saying, “They earned every penny they got.”
Vallee also questions Burlington College’s affiliation with the for-profit, Fairfax-based Vermont Woodworking School, which Driscoll cofounded and runs. Though it was arranged under O’Meara Sanders’ reign, a 2011 evaluation by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges found that the mother-daughter “relationship is clear to all constituents, from the Board on down to the faculty” and that measures had been taken to avoid conflicts of interest.
Driscoll declined to comment, as did the Sanders campaign, though last fall spokesman Michael Briggs called Vallee “pathetic” and a “junior varsity version of the Koch brothers.”
Perhaps more damaging than the TV ad was a March 2015 story in the Daily Caller, a conservative news outlet, which alleged that O’Meara Sanders “may have defrauded” a state agency when Burlington College borrowed money to finance its expansion. Couched in the conditional, the story questioned the discrepancy between the $2.6 million the college listed in pledged donations in its December 2010 loan application and the $1.3 million it listed in an audit the following summer.
The allegation, bolstered by attorney and Fox News talking head Jonna Spilbor, was that O’Meara Sanders cooked the books in order to satisfy a loan requirement that Burlington College show at least $2.27 million in pledged contributions.
In its application to the state agency — the Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency — the school promised that “one gift of $1-million has been committed and another $1-million has been verbally pledged.” Years later, in August 2014, O’Meara Sanders’ successor told WCAX she had belatedly learned that one of those pledges was actually a bequest, meaning the school couldn’t count on it anytime soon.
“The understanding at the time was that it was a cash gift, and we proceeded until we understood it was a bequest,” then-president Christine Plunkett told the station.
Board members were reluctant to discuss the questionable contribution, fearing they’d run afoul of a skittish donor. But Luck, the former finance VP, says everything was kosher.
“It was a legitimate, bona fide, legal gift that’s still going to come to the college someday,” he says.
Even at the time, Burlington College’s application raised red flags with two VEHBFA board members, Agency of Human Services policy adviser Charly Dickerson and then-tax commissioner Tom Pelham. According to minutes from the meeting, Dickerson voted nay “out of concerns for Burlington College’s financial strength and its ability to repay the debt.”
Pelham recalls the deal as a “fire sale” that wasn’t good for the college, the diocese or the city — only good for the bank, which he figured would eventually acquire the property, assessed at nearly $20 million.
“I’ve done a lot of public sector-development. I know what a good project looks like, and this one just didn’t have it,” says Pelham, who asked for an unusual recorded vote on the matter. “In retrospect, I was on the money.”
As Burlington College struggled to stay afloat last year in a sea of debt, it was forced to sell off more than 27 acres of the property to developer Eric Farrell, who paid $7.65 million. The sale prompted protests from those who hoped to save the undeveloped land from Farrell’s housing plans.
But even after the school’s near-collapse, O’Meara Sanders argued that, had she remained in charge, she could have finished the job.
“I really am not in a position, nor do I want to be in a position, to judge what people did after I left,” she told the Daily Caller. “I have no doubt that if [my plan] would have been implemented as set forth, the college would be in great shape.”
Her allies agree, pinning the blame on Plunkett, who also resigned under pressure last August.
“After Jane left, every staff and faculty member key to the college’s success was systematically pushed out, fired or treated poorly,” says Carmen George, who served as development coordinator during O’Meara Sanders’ tenure and left shortly thereafter. “Which in my opinion led to the ultimate bad financial situation of the college.”
O’Meara Sanders may never be able to prove she could have steered Burlington College to safer waters. But now that she’s helming an even bigger ship — a presidential campaign that expects to raise more than $50 million — she’s got another chance to be captain. Or, at least, first mate.
The original print version of this article was headlined “Jane Says”
This article appears in Jun 17-22, 2015.



Paul Heintz should have written “Grill’s view is hardly the consensus OF THE FEW PEOPLE I SPOKE WITH who worked with Sanders”. It is really unconscionable investigative reporting to conflate opinion with fact in this way. Anyone who has actually worked with or under Jane Sanders, sadly, will have to laugh or cry at this patently false statement.
Re. The comment about the inappropriateness of Grill’s comment: the revolt of students and faculty in response to the working conditions and lack of regard for students at the time of Grill’s firing became so extreme a cultural review was mandated by the Board. Overwhelmingly, the faculty and staff pointed directly to Sanders and her management style as the single biggest problem. Depressingly, the way this crises was managed only resulted in a consolidation of Sander’s control and purposeful elimination of faculty representation in decision-making functions of the College. There was henceforth no opportunity to question the unilateral decisions of Sanders, making the Diocese fiasco inevitable. By the time Sanders left, the majority of faculty and staff who were there at the beginning of Sander’s tenure were gone, some more willingly than others.
Jane Sanders ruled Burlington College like a tin pot dictator. If Fox News ever manages to lift the lid on the particularly rotten dish that is Burlington College, then Bernie will definitely have a hurdle to jump. I think he can jump it. Most people are more interested in his economic message. But the odor will still stink for a while. The bigger problem will come when and if some of the mentally unstable behavior that Jane displayed at Burlington College emerges in some other context on the campaign trail.
Burlington College a rotten dish ? Go meet the great students and falculty it might change your mind. The current leadership is experinced and on track and this school fills a niche that many do not.
Ran like a dictatorship just like commie Sanders would run America. That is no First Lady material either. Even Moochelle had some grace and class.
Heintz is obviously biased if you go back and check out the articles that he’s written. It’s easy for a journalist to ask questions in such a way as to lead the person being interviewed to answer them a certain way. I should know. I’m a freelance journalist and author. Heintz needs to start reporting news and stay away from writing opinionated articles based on supposition and innuendo.
There is surprisingly little info in this article. I was curious to learn more about Jane Sanders. But this article is mostly unsubstantiated allegations with little detail. Much is suggested without proven and left at that. It’s dissatisfying, not to mention seeming like a hit piece. I love great investigative journalism, which this is not an example of.
Genese Grills defense is that shes been using her real name on her campaign page? I would certainly hope so! That does not excuse her from getting caught trying to run a dirty campaign and trying to stir up negativity against her opponent by impersonating an anonymous commenter online. Surely, she could easily find the account info button at the top of this page if she really wanted to use her own name?
However, this is in keeping with her usual modus operandi of relentlessly spamming the Front Porch Forum with her anti-mall propaganda, which many believe led to the failure of that campaign because people were put off by her long-winded rants there, which often exceeded 10-15 pages . This abuse of public forums is quite in keeping with the political strategies of a post-Trump era. Genese also tried to sabotage Bernies campaign by smearing his wife during the election because of a personal grudge over being unceremoniously fired from her last academic post, years ago. She didnt care if Bernie, whom she supported, lost; her only small-minded and petty goal was to keep Jane Sanders out of the White House as First Lady (see http://sevendaysvt-test.newspackstaging.com/vermont/jane-says-sanders-secret-weapon-or-a-political-liability/Content?oid=2670992).
However, if she doesnt get her way, we may expect to see this city council hopeful collapsing on the floor of the police station in tears again, which is where she was observed last summer after another failed campaign to stop the air show. Burlington, please dig deeper and ask yourselves who you really want having access to city government?