
Gov. Phil Scott opened his first State of the State address Thursday by touting what he doesn’t plan to do: raise taxes or fees.
Providing a bleak assessment of Vermont’s economy, Scott proposed one major remedy: Bring more workers to the state. The first-term Republican pledged to undertake a “bold, sophisticated campaign to identify and persuade working-age individuals, families and entrepreneurs to relocate [to] Vermont.”
The specific recruitment ideas he offered were modest and mostly targeted at military service-members and veterans. They included paying full college tuition for members of the Vermont National Guard and eliminating state income taxes on military pensions.
He also pledged to entice working-age residents to stay in Vermont, in part by expanding the state’s adult technical education program.
Scott argued that, in his first year in office, he had helped the state “stop digging” itself into a deeper financial hole, but he suggested that there was more work to be done.
“Having fiscal discipline means facing facts,” the governor told the packed House chamber.
Emphasizing the state’s shrinking student population, Scott called on lawmakers to work with him “to transform our K-12 system, based on the needs of our kids and not nostalgia.” He said he would not accept higher statewide property taxes, though he did not explain how he would achieve that goal.
Scott urged the legislature to turn its attention to less prosperous communities outside of Chittenden County, saying, “Let’s make this session their session.” House Speaker Mitzi Johnson (D-South Hero) and Senate President Pro Tempore Tim Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) have made similar pledges.
The governor’s speech came during a break in a daylong debate on the House floor over whether to legalize marijuana. Scott took a jab at the legislature’s ongoing effort to pass a legalization bill similar to one he vetoed last year.“We must consider the effects our actions have in every county, city and town,” he said. “Imagine how it must seem to a family who’s struggling to get by, who can’t afford to pay their property tax bill, to turn on the news and hear that the marijuana debate was ranked Vermont’s number one news story of 2017.”
Immediately after the governor’s speech concluded, the House resumed debating the bill, which Scott now plans to sign if it reaches his desk in its current form.
Toward the end of his 36-minute address, the governor acknowledged the need to clean up the state’s waterways and mitigate the effects of climate change, though he made no concrete commitment to fund the former. The only specific proposal he offered to address the latter was “to make electric vehicles more accessible to all.”
Scott also highlighted the importance of addressing the state’s ongoing opiate addiction crisis. He said his administration would work to increase the number of treatment providers and help people in recovery find employment.

“A lot of the policies that he was mentioning are things that we are working on and we have been working on together. So I don’t think there were any surprises in his speech,” House Majority Leader Jill Krowinski (D-Burlington) told reporters later Thursday.
Both Krowinski and Ashe said they shared Scott’s goal of attracting more workers in principle, but Ashe expressed skepticism about the governor’s chances of succeeding. “The rub is every state would like more younger workers in their state and silver bullets to achieve that have been elusive.” Earlier attempts, he said, have cost a “tremendous amount of money with very little payoff.”
The Democratic leaders also doubted whether Scott could deliver on his agenda without making harmful cuts elsewhere. “We don’t have any details on exactly how he’s going to be paying for these programs,” Krowinski noted.
Referring to Scott’s stated aim of promoting “economic growth and affordability, while protecting the vulnerable,” Ashe said, “I think this is going to be more of a gut check year about what actually is meant by ‘protect the vulnerable.'”
Although his firm no-taxes-or-fees stance was almost certain to lead to clashes with the Democrat-led legislature, Scott concluded his speech with a plea for civility, cautioning against “the instinct to retreat to ideological corners.”
He earned the loudest bipartisan applause after saying, “We must do everything we can to pull our nation out of darkness and restore civility and respect to our public process … We can work together towards consensus whenever possible, and compromise when its required.”
Disclosure: Tim Ashe is the domestic partner of Seven Days publisher and coeditor Paula Routly. Find our conflict-of-interest policy here: sevendaysvt.com/disclosure.



Phil said addressing opiate addiction is important, but also asked us to think about how working class families must feel when the legislature debates marijuana legalization. He sees the two issues as wholly unrelated. Is that accurate?
You need high speed internet and good paying jobs, and vetoing cannabis was a big mistake. Also, tax the rich.
And yet it seems more people are moving to Vermont.
http://www.vermontbiz.com/news/2018/januar…
Why is War Crime Prep School a necessary pre-requisite to receiving government benefits. Imagine if you could get a free college education for doing non-profit work or some other selfless act for society.
But nope, you gotta go to pew-pew school.
There are many thousands of highly qualified, well-educated Vermonters who are eager to work at those well-paying jobs, but employers refuse to consider their applications because of their age. The pool of workers who are over 65 find their responses to recruitment routinely ignored. Perhaps ageism is the last frontier of discrimination in the workplace. The result is an economic underclass, relegated to attempting to make ends meet with their meager Social Security allotments and sadly, many of them find it necessary to sell their homes and leave Vermont because their knowledge and energy are spurned.
If you want more young workers then you are going to have to have good paying jobs to attract them/keep them here.
Wait, Scott thinks it’s okay to tax our social security benefits, but not military pensions? Why? And what about offering free college tuition to everyone, not just the military? What is the underlying reason for these proposals that are targeted to one specific group — those in the business of war? With Scott’s embrace of the inappropriate and environmentally harmful F35 basing, this push to selectively and specically grow the Vt National Guard at the expense of the civilian population will continue to advance the over militarization of Vermont. Have the people of Vermont ever actually demanded these benefits, and asked that their precious tax dollars support this direction? Is this really the priority of our state?
I think if Vermont focused on creating more progressive policies and infrastructure (we’ve done a great job, but could do even better) – better public transportation, universal childcare, universal college education, even more renewable energy, mandatory paid family leave and paid sick leave, etc – this could be a big draw! These are investments!
I like US Veterans. I am one of them. BUT Giving them a tax break on their retirement and education benefits??
Let us remember MOST Vermonters First! Retired Veterans had a good job, are getting a REAL pension, and have medical benefits most Vermonters DO NOT have.
Let’s do more for Vermonters who do not have it so good FIRST! Freeze their property taxes at what they were at 65. No increases. Let make sure they ALL some type of pension benefit. Let’s make sure that they Medicare and Medicaid benefit are not compromised by Trump and fill in any holes.
When this is done I fully support Scott’s idea for Veterans as long as all other Vermonters get the same benefits!
I’m a freelance designer, web developer and photographer, who is 59 years old. I have been unable to find work, either for an employer, or as a 1099 contractor. Ageism is alive and well, here. I will be leaving Vermont, not by choice, but out of necessity to survive. I’ve spent much of my life here, but living in this state is no longer tenable.
Taxing the rich will not attract business.
We don’t want to tax the rich, we want to eat them.
@ Philo
And yet you oppose anything and everything, including the housing that young workers need in order to be able to accept a job in Vermont.