
Labs, spaniels and mutts trotted about freely last Thursday evening at Burlington’s Starr Farm Dog Park as their owners chatted amiably and admired the sunset over Lake Champlain.
The canine crowd was in dog heaven. But not everyone views this place as paradise. The off-leash dog park in the New North End, now 15 years old and a regular recipient of good reviews on Yelp, has gotten too popular, according to some neighbors.
“People go over there, and they hang ’round in the middle of the park and chitchat while their dogs run rampant,” said Lee Brown, who lives across from the park on Curtis Avenue. “It’s a free-for-all.”
Barking resonates from early morning until dark, and at busy times, the small lot next to the park fills up and visitors park in the neighborhood, according to Brown.
The problem is not just dogs, he added: “It’s a hangout at night, late at night. There’s cars parked in there at 10:30, 11 o’clock. Who knows what they are doing?”
Critics want to shrink the two-acre space and limit its hours, which now run officially from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. or dusk, whichever comes first.
They also want people who don’t live in Burlington to pay a fee to use the fenced-in space, which is next to the Burlington Bike Path, near suburban-style streets and historic summer camps on the old Flynn estate.
It’s not that he dislikes man’s best friend, Brown insisted: “I have two dogs. It’s the noise and the traffic, and it’s free and it shouldn’t be free.”
Regulars who use the park and appreciate it — including people who, like Brown, live on Curtis Avenue — disagree sharply with his version of what goes down at the canine gathering place. They were dismayed to learn from a reporter that proposed changes to the park are on the Burlington Parks Commission agenda.

The proposals are preliminary, and nothing will be decided at the group’s next meeting on August 4. Still, dog-park enthusiasts, including Curtis Avenue residents Carolyn Gipson and Debra Kaigle, were alarmed to hear that one of their favorite amenities could be downsized. “I think the space is great,” said Kaigle, as her mixed-breed dog Caesar — heritage unknown — played with Gipson’s silky black lab mix, Cody. “Dogs need room to run,” Kaigle said.
Sometimes the dogs bark in the park, but dogs bark in backyards, too, and that’s generally accepted, Kaigle added. “That’s OK … But here in the park — then it’s a problem?” she asked rhetorically.
Similarly, she reasoned, if people talk at the park, that’s a good thing — social connections are important. “You just meet people you might not meet otherwise,” she said.
Much like parents who bond at a playground, dog people bond at the park. They share doggie biscuits and swap training strategies for rambunctious puppies just learning to sit, come and stay. They cluck in gentle disapproval when their pups ignore commands and rein in Rover when he gets too rough.
Just as parents expect other parents to remove tantrum-throwing children from the playground, dog park regulars expect owners to take difficult dogs away.
Most people get it. Even so, Gipson acknowledged occasional problems. A few years back, a German shepherd bit her on the elbow without warning. “I went, ‘Aren’t you a pretty dog?’ and he attacked me,” she said. Gipson’s winter jacket helped protect her, and while painful, the bite was not serious. “It was an isolated incident,” Gipson said.
As the two neighbors spoke, about 20 dogs romped in the park. Some wrestled and rolled, but none fought and few yapped. The birds in the trees around the park were making more noise than the dogs. The grassy grounds of the spacious park were clean — no visible piles to avoid — and all of the dog owners appeared to be cleaning up after their animals as required.
Volunteers, including Kaigle, lock the fence gates at night and open them in the morning, she said. They also help provide amenities — the wading pools pups splash in next to the hose, water bowls and hand-painted signs declaring: “A Tired Dog Is A Good Dog” and “Run Free.”
Many dog owners say their pets are happier and less neurotic when they have the freedom to exercise without a leash attached. Apartment dwellers with no yards and people who want to socialize their dogs also advocated for an off-leash park. When it opened in 2000, Starr Farm was one of the first in Chittenden County.
Today, Burlington is a dog-friendly place. Numerous hotels allow canines to accompany their owners. Office workers come off elevators coddling tiny dogs like infants. It’s not uncommon to see dogs with people in line at the bank or licking their own cones at a creemee stand. In response to demand, more dog parks have opened.
South Burlington has a park on Kirby Road, and Shelburne dogs congregate off Harbor Road. Burlington has a second dog park on the waterfront.
Winooski residents started a Facebook page to successfully petition for the city’s first dog park. It’s tentatively scheduled to open on West Allen Street in September.
A third dog park could open in Burlington soon, at Oakledge Park in the city’s South End. Jesse Bridges, Burlington parks and recreation director, said a study is under way to see if there might be a suitable space there.
The parks don’t cause a lot of problems, according to officials, aside from occasional reports of aggressive dog behavior. Hours tend to be similar to Starr Farm’s. In Shelburne, $1 from each cat or dog license helps maintain the dog park, and volunteers raise additional funds by producing a calendar with glossy photos of local dogs.
Winooski has budgeted up to $35,000 to create its new dog park. After one homeowner worried about noise, the city agreed to move it farther from the home and to put in a landscaping buffer, according to Winooski community services director Ray Coffey. Otherwise, the response to the park has been overwhelmingly positive, Coffey added.
In Burlington, only a few have complained about noise at the Urban Reserve Off Leash Dog Park, which, at the northern end of the downtown waterfront, doesn’t directly impact residents.
Starr Farm Park, in contrast, is surrounded by homes, and some of the occupants are fed up, according to Burlington City Councilor Dave Hartnett. The North District independent has been lobbying the Weinberger administration to address the situation. “The park’s not going anywhere; it’s very popular,” Hartnett said. “I don’t see it being moved; I don’t see it closing. But that being said, we certainly have to make some changes if it is going to stay.”
Making it smaller would mean less maintenance and perhaps fewer dogs and reduced noise, he suggested. Hartnett is also interested in a fee system. While he and Bridges agree that it would be financially impractical to pay an attendant to monitor the park, they’re considering a tag system that would tie in to the city’s dog-licensing program. Bridges suggested that Burlington residents might get the park tag for free with a dog license, while nonresidents would have to pay a fee for a park tag. Enforcement could boost licensing among the many scofflaw dogs in Burlington.
Plenty of canine lovers from Colchester are also using Starr Farm. Hartnett said he’d like to see Vermont’s fourth most populous municipality “step up” and establish its own off-leash dog park.
Colchester leaders say they would welcome a dog park — if volunteers materialize to help organize and maintain it. “What I’d like to have is a unified group of folks that would move it forward,” said Glen Cuttitta, Colchester parks and recreation director.
Cuttitta pointed out, however, that under municipal rules, dogs are already allowed to run off-leash in Colchester parks, as long as they’re under the owner’s verbal control.
And Colchester residents who are regulars at Starr Farm Dog Park would not necessarily change their habits. Marlene Williamson comes to Starr Farm several times a week with her Australian shepherd, Willow, and knows many of the other dog owners. “That’s our little corner over there with all the chairs,” she explained, pointing to a circle of lawn furniture next to a tree in a shady spot.
Williamson has made many friends at the park, and they like to sit and chat as they throw tennis balls to their dogs. Jen Popovitch, also a Colchester resident, owns a Brittany spaniel, Tegan, who streaked across the grass to fetch a ball again and again. Trim and graceful, with a clean white and caramel coat, the 8-month-old dog looked happy to stretch his legs. “This is so great, and it’s so close to home,” said Popovitch.
She and Williamson said they would happily pay to use Starr Farm.
But Popovitch said the park does get crowded. She avoids coming between 3:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. when “it’s just too busy,” with “bigger, hyper dogs.” Limiting the hours and reducing the size of the park could make it like that all the time, she speculated.
Bridges aims to balance the needs of supporters and critics of the park, noting that no changes would be implemented until 2016 at the earliest. The city’s canine constituents — who don’t vote — can only hope they get it right.
The Parks Commission will talk about changes to Starr Farm Park on Tuesday, August 4 at 5:30 p.m. in the Burlington Public Works Department building at 645 Pine Street.
This article appears in The Animal Issue July 2015 (Theme Issue).


People park at the dog park and then walk down to the beach. Traffic problem isn’t the dog park, it’s the beach goers who want to park as close as possible. I was at the park this weekend and there were 6 dogs and the lot was full. If people want to threaten to change or even close the park, they should make sure that they are addressing the right problem.
Wednesday is the fifth. Do you mean the Tuesday the fourth, or Wednesday the fifth?
IamNabil — Thanks for catching that! The correct date of the meeting is Tuesday, August 4.
Or they park at the dog park and go over to the playground/park next door when that lot fills up, mostly when they have the soccer games. I’m also a volunteer that closes the park on Friday evenings, and use the park frequently. Agreed with Trevor, address the right problems, don’t make those of us who do use that park for our dogs pay for the misuse of others.
I don’t think making the dog park smaller would help the issue… The same dogs would be in there but in a smaller space making it feel more crowded. I agree with the other commenters about parking being used for the beach and the human park. Perhaps selling dog-park parking stickers for cars would work? You would have to have a sticker to park there and the money raised would go towards maintenance. Most dog owners wouldn’t mind paying for a nice park!
As a childless Colchester resident that pays substantial property taxes, I called the parks and recreation department to ask where I could take my dog (well behaved, on leashed) to a lake access where he could swim on hot days. Answer: nowhere.
Sounds like one solution to one of the neighbors concerns would be to increase parking.
Some of the people who park at the dog park do not use the park nor do they have dogs! I don’t know where they actually go, but they typically are coming from or going to the bike path. So the dog park lot will become full during peak times, but not all cars belong to people using the park. The park closes at 8pm, but even after the gate is locked and the dogs and their owners have gone there are often a couple cars left in the park.
In a related issue, the neighboring “human” park frequently experiences not enough parking during the soccer games. Sounds like that park could also use extra parking.
– Joanne
I have been a regular at the dog park and resident of the NNE since 2003.
While I’m somewhat sympathetic, this story screams NIMBY. The only real proposed solution that would address the concern would be to open another dog park. To the extent that there are solutions that require, tags, or parking passes, or whatever, the issue will always be enforcement. By who and how will those be enforced? Enforcement costs money, likely more money than it would raise. With respect to a fee, I pay fairly high property taxes here in BTV. We don’t charge fees for basketball courts, tennis courts, trails, soccer or baseball fields, skate parks, or bike paths. Singling out dog parks is patently unfair. Property taxes support access to all these parks equally. Here, the idea of a fee is used not as a revenue generator, but as a barrier to use. That’s improper.
A better idea is to educate those who use the park of their impacts on the local neighborhood and ask them to respect the neighborhood. My experience at that park is that the vast majority of visitors are fairly contentious folks who are thankful to have a nice place in town to take their dog. I’d wager they’d do what they could to alleviate the neighborhood’s concerns.
Good idea to require a dog license in all parks — dog park and other parks. To get a dog license one has to show proof of up-to-date rabies vaccine which is an important public health issue. Burlington also needs to have a resident and a non-resident dog license, with fees ear marked for upkeep of the dog parks. And, we want an animal protection officer.
Starr Farm Dog Park is an AWESOME volunteer managed park that runs amazingly well considering how many people and dogs go there. Unfortunately, a few VERY vocal and power hungry people are spreading erroneous rumors that the dog park is a wild free for all. Overall, it is a fun, loving, peaceful, and positive place that promotes a sense of community among dog owners. There will always be a couple issues as there are with all public places (way worse things go down in the “human” parks). Once in a while dogs will have a scuffle, but considering the large number of dogs and owners who go there it is amazing so little problems have occurred… Largely because people monitor their dogs and the park is large enough so that dogs have enough space to distance themselves from negative interactions. The gates remain locked from 8pm-8am; if anyone is in there at night and in the early morning they are in there illegally. If residents such as Lee Brown see people breaking the law or noise ordinance they should alert the police to solve the problem and NOT make the law abiding dog owners suffer. Much of the negative commentary is blown out of proportion.
How about dog license with option for a parking pass for dog parks. Display on mirror, like a handicap parking permit. And police monitor the parking, give tickets for people who park there to use the bikepath or a nearby beach. There ARE solutions to these problems.
Take it to your NPA. http://wards4and7npa.blogspot.com/ Cty Councilors are there every month to hear about issues in your neighborhood that they can help resolve. Every NPA meeting (fourth Wednesday, Miller Center) has a speak out for items not on the agenda, and with some notice you can request that it be an agenda item. 4nd7npa@gmail.com
Lee Brown is quoted saying, “People go over there, and they hang ’round in the middle of the park and chitchat while their dogs run rampant” — as if that isn’t the entire point of a dog park. Dogs need to socialize. So do their humans. The Starr Farm dog park has a great community of humans who keep an eye on their dogs and separate them when things get too barky or growly. Councilor Hartnett’s suggestions are counterproductive: making the park smaller would make it harder for owners to defuse incidents, and therefore cause more noise. And I’m curious just how much city maintenance this volunteer-run park requires, and how making the park smaller would change that? As far as I know the only city maintenance is trash pickup.
leaterhune, dog licenses are already required at the dog park, and I’ve seen volunteers ask people to leave whose dogs were unlicensed. Vaccinations are important and without a license we have no idea what a dog’s health status is.
raincntry, amen to “We don’t charge fees for basketball courts, tennis courts, trails, soccer or baseball fields, skate parks, or bike paths. Singling out dog parks is patently unfair.” (But I think you meant park users are “conscientious” (thoughtful) and not “contentious” (argumentative) :-))