“I’m here because I’m afraid I’m going to die!” two dozen people yelled in unison, disrupting Scott’s State of the State speech Thursday afternoon.
Wearing red shirts and holding “Climate Action Now!” banners, the protesters listened to Scott for less than a minute before they stood and began shouting slogans about the importance of responding to climate change.
“Climate change means famine in Vermont!” the protesters screamed from the back of the House chamber.
Scott, who was aware the protesters were likely to disrupt the speech, stood patiently at the dais. He attempted to break in after five minutes or so, but the protesters continued.
“Yes!” many of them replied, and they broke into applause.
Lt. Gov. David Zuckerman then called a recess. About a dozen state troopers strode single-file into the chamber and joined capitol police in leading the protesters from the House chamber.
“We’re calling on everyone to help!” yelled one of the last to be escorted out.
Police detained 16 activists, and Scott returned to his prepared remarks. The protesters were later released. One was cited to court on a suspicion of disorderly conduct charge. The others were told to keep out of the Statehouse for the rest of the day.
Among them was 14-year-old Montpelier resident Neah Clammer, who said she joined the demonstration because she’s concerned that climate change could bring humanity to the brink of extinction within her lifetime.
“I have a right to a future,” Clammer said. Asked what message she wanted lawmakers to take from the protest, she replied, “I hope that they listen to the people.”
While Scott mentioned a few initiatives aimed at addressing climate change — such as accelerating the state’s transition to electric vehicles — several lawmakers said the lack of substantive measures proved protesters’ point.
“After a protest like that, I thought it was ironic to have the climate portion of the speech be kind of a laundry list of some of the things we did last year,” said Rep. Selene Colburn (P-Burlington).
Instead of proposing something such as an electric bus as a solution to climate change, Rep. Diana Gonzalez (P-Winooski) said, Scott should embrace more impactful solutions, like getting more people to ride the buses the state already has.
Scott, a self-described “car guy” who races stock cars, marveled at the new models of electric cars being introduced, including a 450-horsepower electric Ford Mustang. While he cited the $1 million already earmarked for electric vehicle purchase incentives, Scott again made it clear he opposes climate initiatives that are effectively a tax on carbon.
He cited seniors who have to heat their homes and working poor who drive long distances and “struggle to fill their gas tanks.”
“I simply cannot support proposals that will make things more expensive for them,” Scott said.
Democratic leaders noted Scott’s lofty rhetoric contained few, if any, new ideas.
“There were no new initiatives in the address that I’m aware of,” Senate President Pro Tempore Tim Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) said of Scott’s climate proposals.
House Speaker Mitzi Johnson (D-South Hero) said she never really expects the State of the State to contain much substance. That comes when the governor explains in his budget address how he intends to accomplish his goals, she said.
But even by that measure, Johnson said, she heard little more in the speech than “expanded initiatives on a couple of existing things.”
“This one spent a little time in the rearview mirror more than others,” Johnson said. “I found that interesting.”
One concrete proposal would create a “universal after-school network” of enrichment programs that would align students’ days with those of their working parents. Scott said a similar program in Iceland has shown positive outcomes for young people.
“Kids who participate in after-school activities and programs do better in school and in life than kids who don’t,” Scott said.
Rep. Heidi Scheuermann (R-Stowe) praised Scott for hitting several important themes, but expressed reservations.
“I have concerns about starting a new program like that without addressing the underlying problem of the education finance funding system,” she said.
Scott said he shared concerns about the tax burden on Vermonters, and said he planned “additional targeted tax relief” in his budget. He did not elaborate.
Much of Scott’s speech touched upon themes he has addressed for years, such as the “demographic crisis” of people leaving Vermont and the rural-urban divide in the state.
“Think about this: Of the five towns that have seen the most growth in recent years, four of them are in Chittenden County,” Scott said. “Of the 180 legislators in this room, 106 of you come from counties that have lost workers.”
Scott cited the success of the state’s remote worker program, which has paid 371 workers up to $10,000 each to move here. He also pledged to do more to increase job training.
He also reported progress on building new housing, crediting the $37 million housing bond passed in 2017 with helping spur the building of nearly 800 units.
He expressed optimism that Act 250 can be updated this session in a way that supports his vision for reinvigorating downtowns. He also heaped praise on Vermonters who serve their communities, such as those who staff the Ludlow Fire Department; drive innovation, such as electric aircraft entrepreneur Kyle Clark; and care for others, such as Marjorie Meyer, a doctor treating women with opioid dependency.
“So even as we face major challenges, these Vermonters show that in the hands of our people, doing all they can every day, the state of the state is strong,” Scott said.
Despite his focus on these and other issues, the climate concerns largely upstaged Scott’s positive vision of the state.
Protestors gathered outside the Statehouse in the hours leading up to his address for a loud and visual demonstration. Speakers urged lawmakers to take bolder action, and attendees clanged pots and pans in agreement.
“They represent the blood spilled by beings all over the world who are being killed in the climate crisis and environmental degradation,” Jensen said.
“We feel that this is where the climate is being talked about appropriately,” Cuming said. “Phil Scott is not necessarily a friend of the Climate Queens.”
Another protestor, Hannah Morgan, listened to speakers with her 11-month-old son bundled on her chest. Asked why she felt compelled to attend, she pointed down.
“For him, and the sake of his future, and the feeling that we’re out of time to be deliberating,” she said.
Paul Heintz and Colin Flanders contributed reporting.






So many inspiring Vermonters showed up to speak at the Extinction Rebellion Alternative State of the State rally, outside the State house this morning, and their ideas for how to confront the climate change crisis are much more inspiring and prescient than what our Governor put forth today. It is a shame that so little reporting about today’s speeches and protests included their contributions for a brighter future in our state: peaceful coexistence with the international community, strong support of union labor and economic opportunity through Green New Deal jobs, social and green infrastructure investment for transportation, and reimagining the way we subsidize and incentivize agriculture in order to emphasize regenerating the soil and developing powerful local economies and food chains. These are the ideas that Vermonters want to see put forth into bill, law, and regulation.
I was I’n Montpelier, and I believe I saw a few of the protesters climb out of an F150.
I laughed
It’s really neither helpful nor productive to expect ideological purity on the issue of climate when the webs of consumption and production are so entangled and complex, as they are at this moment in human history. Instead of humorous comments, we might spend our time on reflective action.
It’s really not helpful to expect ideological purity on the issue of climate when the webs of consumption and production are so entangled and complex, as they are at this moment in human history. Instead of humorous comments, we might spend our time on reflective action.
While the caring for our planet and passion of the climate protesters is admirable, the effectiveness of their tactics is questionable. Far better to concentrate on the presidential election where real change is possible.
Nearby New Hampshire is extremely important. If in the year 2000 the number of people who voted for Ralph Nadar there had voted for Al Gore, Al Gore would have become president and what a different world we would be living in.
Trump lost New Hampshire by only a few thousand votes and it is a key state again this year.
If one is serious about climate change, one needs to be concerned with actually making change that matters.
The crew in red are the same idiots that protested the amount of fuel people are burning by blocking traffic during afternoon commutes, thus causing them to burn even more fuel while idling aimlessly. If they actually cared as much about their cause as they do about getting attention, they might actually be able to contribute something of value to the discussion.
I urge the protesters to take a ride down I-80, I-78 and especially I-81. When you see the humongous truck depots, diesels idling, you’re bound to think VT is pristine.
Look, you can work to get Vermonters’on board for climate action, like get everyone to recycle correctly. But carbon tax will punish hard working Vermonters just trying to get by and make a decent living.
Protesting in Montpelier has little effect on the overall deal and keep in mind, carbon emmissions in the US are being reduced much better than the rest of the industrialized world.
“Climate change means famine in Vermont!”
In 1968, as a young impressionable college adult, I too was misled by professorial social alarmists, to the detriment of my willingness to join established society. Yes, I managed, despite my temporary rejection of reality. But I often wonder what and where I would be today, had I not wasted my time with the disingenuous political propaganda.
“The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” Paul Ehrlich, 1968 ,The Population Bomb
That was 50 years ago. And I caution all young adults who today are being inundated with the current ‘end is near’ mindset. It’s not going to happen. History shows us that the best and brightest of our society always find a way, and that our entrepreneurial spirit in free and unfettered markets will continue to foster the ever-improving standard of living to which we are accustomed.