Vermont Supreme Court Credit: File
The Vermont Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on October 22 in a case about the Burlington Telecom sale.

The Burlington City Council approved the BT sale to Indiana-based Schurz Communications in 2017 for $30.8 million. The Vermont Public Utility Commission approved the deal in February.

But a group of six citizen intervenors — Sandra Baird, Jared Carter, Dean Corren, Steven Goodkind, Solveig Overby and Shay Totten — say the city’s $7 million net profit won’t recoup the $16.9 million in taxpayer funds that former mayor Bob Kiss diverted to keep the sinking telecom afloat. The group appealed the PUC decision in May.

The telecom, operating locally as Champlain Broadband, has already filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The court has not yet ruled on the motion, according to Burlington city attorney Eileen Blackwood.

The motion to dismiss argues the intervenors’ case is moot because the BT sale has already closed, and “courts can only decide something that is an active and live controversy,” Blackwood said.

In March, the intervenors filed a motion asking the utility commission to reconsider its approval of the sale. They argued that state law and the Burlington city charter protect taxpayers from being saddled with debt resulting from telecom sales.

The PUC ruled in April that the charter was immaterial and that telecom deals must only “promote the general good of the state.” In a press release Tuesday, intervenor Overby said the sale ignores the “public good, the public will and the law.”

Blackwood said intervenors could have also asked the PUC for a stay, which may have halted the transaction.

“They didn’t, so the sale went through,” she said. “Now the case itself is moot. There’s nothing more to decide. It’s really final.”

The intervenors disagree.

“Despite the great lengths the mayor and Schurz have gone to in order to give the impression that the deal is done, it is not,” Corren said in the press release. “The Supreme Court will decide.”

Got something to say?

Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!

Courtney Lamdin is a staff writer at Seven Days, covering politics, policy and public safety in Burlington. She has received top honors from the New England Newspaper & Press Association, including for "Warning Shots," a coauthored investigation into...

3 replies on “Vermont Supreme Court to Hear Burlington Telecom Case”

  1. Please…………..Keep BT local was never a serious offer. With the sale to Schurz Communications we lose a lot less the keeping it local!

  2. Hopefully the Court will rule against the city and taxpayers will get the money owed to them. I have BT and have liked them a lot although the monthly bill has increased twice within the last 9 months. I think I’m gonna have to compare prices with Comcast even though I hate to..

  3. Taxes shouldn’t make a corporation rich – I’d like it better if we owned BT. I wasn’t living here when this all happened, but from what I’ve heard someone made a lot of money (our money) and we’ll be better off if we win this case.

Comments are closed.