Now, a Vermont Republican contends that both Sanders and Pearson violated state campaign finance laws in the process.
Brady Toensing, a Charlotte attorney and Vermont Republican Party vice chair, filed the complaint Tuesday with state Attorney General Bill Sorrell.
At issue is a May email Sanders sent to the vast network of supporters he established as a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination. Sanders urged recipients to split a contribution between him and eight like-minded state legislative candidates around the country, including Pearson, who worked for Sanders in the late 1990s.
Pearson, of Burlington, is currently a Progressive Party state representative. He’s running as a Progressive/Democrat for one of six seats representing Chittenden County in the state Senate.
“Chris is a good friend of working people and of mine,” Sanders said in the email.
Pearson ended up raising approximately $90,000 for his campaign — more than $80,000 of which Toensing said can be tied to Sanders’ email solicitation.
Pearson used his windfall to make contributions to other state candidates. And the cash gave Pearson a significant leg up financially in the crowded field of state Senate candidates. He won a Democratic nomination in the August 9 primary.
Sanders’ email list had a value that Toensing estimated to be in excess of $5 million. The list and its value should have counted as an in-kind contribution to Pearson’s campaign, Toensing argued. Neither Pearson nor Sanders declared it as a contribution in campaign finance reports, he noted.
Sanders made several similar appeals for candidates in state and congressional races around the country, but Toensing said he focused his complaint on Pearson, who was the only Vermont candidate Sanders chose to single out in the email.
“Here you’ve got the Sanders campaign drawing from all these interests outside of the state to overwhelmingly influence the state senate race,” Toensing said. “It’s everything Sen. Sanders rails against.”
Toensing has levied legal allegations at Sanders before. He’s also previously accused Sorrell of campaign finance violations.
Both Pearson and Sanders dismissed the latest accusation as politically motivated.
The argument bears some resemblance to a case last year, when Sorrell accused Dean Corren, the 2014 Progressive/Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor, of violating campaign finance laws after the Vermont Democratic Party used its email list to promote Corren’s candidacy. Sorrell argued that the list had a value of $255, while Corren was limited to receiving contributions of no more than $50 per person. Corren continues to fight that case in state and federal court.
Pearson, reached Tuesday while on vacation, said he hadn’t had a chance to read Toensing’s complaint. But of Toensing, he said: “The guy files more lawsuits than Donald Trump. He’s found a new way to harass me and harass Bernie Sanders at the same time.”
Sanders’ spokesman Michael Briggs also dismissed Toensing as someone who specializes “in the underhanded, personal destruction tactics that have made so many people disgusted with the Donald Trump brand of politics in America today.”
“The senator is obviously well within his rights to endorse candidates and recommend to his supporters that they contribute to other candidates,” Briggs said. “This is a common fundraising approach which is done by Democrats and Republicans every day all over the country.”
Toensing may have made at least one incorrect assumption in his complaint. He alleged that Pearson must have had to provide account information to the Sanders campaign to coordinate sharing contributions.
Pearson said he didn’t. Sanders’ campaign used the fundraising website ActBlue, which distributed the money to Pearson without his knowledge, he said.
Sorrell acknowledged he’d received the complaint Tuesday, but because state offices were closed for Bennington Battle Day, he said he and his staff had not examined it closely enough to comment.
Related Stories
Got something to say?
Send a letter to the editor and we'll publish your feedback in print!
Brady Toensing clearly learned his craft well from his mother and step-father — Republican attack dogs who infamously pounded the airwaves pushing the Monica Lewinsky scandal and smearing Valerie Plame for partisan purposes.
Ms. Toensing and Mr DiGenova honed the art of using their legal credentials to make multiple bogus claims against Democratic opponents, throwing up ridiculous and groundless claims in an effort to sully the reputations of their opponents.
As a partner in the DC law firm run by his mother and stepfather, Brady has continued that fine tradition of using shameless and baseless partisan attacks on opponents.
Not surprising that the Vermont Republican Party — despite claiming at times to be different than the ugly national party – continues to rely on Toensing to import similar Atwater/ Rove tactics to Vermont.
Instead of offering any insight whatsoever as to whether Senator Sanders might in fact have violated Vermont campaign finance law, what we have below is a well-known left wing attack dog attacking the messenger — and his parents, to boot! — as being right wing attack dogs.
Furthermore, said left wing attack dog offers no evidence for her implied accusation that Mr. Toensing is bringing forth this charge at the request of or the behest of the state Republican Party organization.
Smear vs. alleged smear.
A link to the actual complaint and one to the relevant statute would be far more informative than speculation of motive or efficacy.
This is such a ridiculous accusation that it doesn’t pass the straight-face test. Bernie did what Hillary Clinton and the Bush family have been famous for for years. I’m sure many of the candidates Mr. Toensing supports do it too. It’s called endorsement, and it’s been part of the practice of politics in this country from the very beginning.But the lawyer doesn’t care, as long as he’s making waves and getting press coverage. Even negative press coverage helps him, as the first two commentators here show. Haters just got to hate, and lie to get what they want. Pure piffle, and giving lawyers a worse name than they already have.
You have been on here bad mouthing progressives for as long as I can remember so most of what you say should be taken with a grain of salt as well.
And Progressives like Zuckerman have been badmouthing Democrats for years. They revel in their own self-righteousness and betterness, but when they run for statewide office they don’t have the integrity to run as Progs.